By literature sources I’m acquainted with your great-grandfathers works, Mr. Holmes, and I know that he had his own view on the role of Hebrews and secret organizations, like Masonic lodges, in the History. But from the talks with the Russians I had got a new understanding of the processes of ruling, starting from which my view on the power hierarchy in the society has changed. I don’t know why the very Russians have understood that what for a long time had stared us in the face. There is a whole library of the eminent persons’ utterances about the negative role of Hebrews in the other nations’ histories from Egyptians and Romans to Russians and Germans. Were Julius Caesar, Nero, Catherine the Great, Napoleon and Churchill the fools? Or were they as all others a product of the culture, where such opinions are directly formed for hiding the highest level of the power hierarchy in the society? There is a phrase of Greek historian Plutarch, who was the zhrets of the Delphi’s Oracle at once: “You rule, but you too are ruled”. Just this phrase should have made “the ruling” circles to search for that what the Russians called “the Global Predictor”, the conceptual power based on knowledge, not on force. Your famous philosopher Beckon with his single utterance: “Knowledge is power”, which on some languages is understood in two ways[63], could encourage on looking for this hidden, and thus very effective power.

Then Salem told of that what Holmes had already heard from Verov in Spain. He told of the conceptual power, about the highest level of power hierarchy in the society, which already for many millennia not changing the contention of the conception of ruling has been providing the stability of the crowd-“elitist” pyramid. But there was something new in his words, which apparently neither Andrew nor Paolo had known of.

A conceptual power, the highest level of the power hierarchy in the society as the power institute was born by Ancient Egyptian civilization. But the “mother” didn’t survive this birth. It means that Egyptian civilization came to naught and it became a simple state. So Greeks and later Romans conquered it and after the Rome’s fall it became a part of the Islamic world. Frenchmen and Englishmen tried to make it a part of the biblical world. But probably the substantial unity of the hymns to Aten and the Koran played the main part and one can say that Ehnaton’s ideas won at least in Egypt. By the way, Mr. Holmes, have you noticed the strange repeating of some events separated by two centuries? We Egyptians haven’t forgotten how on the beginning of the 19^th century Napoleon’s army occupied it self with the same thing as the “Taliban” forces in the beginning of the 21^st. They shot the ancient cultural monuments with the field guns. The mark of the French terrorists is at the ancients Sphinx’ face. They failed to destroy it completely only because it the Napoleon’s times there were not missiles used by the talibs for Buddha’s monument demolishing. How do you think, what can connect these two events?

I think that the same clans, purposing the same aims, financed them. The mankind loses its consciousness after having lost its cultural heritage, – answered Holmes.

It’s the most probable, – agreed Salem and opened the picnics already familiar to Holmes. – As you see, Mr. Holmes, the origins of the Russian, and hence the global, puzzle belongs to the Egyptian civilization. And it’s not accidentally that the authors placed 22 hierophants on the first picture of the “Historical Picnic” and the television of the August Putsch’s times is called after the XVIII dynasty. Though there really were not any confrontation between Ehnaton and Tutanhamon, since Tutanhaton (it was his name in the beginning of his ruling) became the pharaoh three years after Ehnaton’s death and for some time tried to follow his father-in-law’s strategy. But later the zhretses of Amon-Ra made him leave the new capital Akhetaton and change his name on Tutanhamon. But all of this wasn’t too essential, because in Egypt the real power, under which primarily the property inheritance was understood, was transferred through women’s line. That’s why many pharaohs’ daughters’ husbands became the pharaohs automatically. More important is that there also was the power of ideas that not always could be handed down. That’s why it’s easy to trace the power of ideas during the global historical process, but it’s extremely hard to trace the power of property, which at first glance caused all the wars. Here, as you can see, it’s told of the four millennia struggle of two party religions of Aten and Amon (Amen). Seemingly these ideas were worthy of it since they have founded their followers for forty centuries. And the Russians are in the certain way right when they connected the events occurring in their country with the worldview split in the Ancient Egyptian society. I thought and assured that nearly all pictures from the first “picnic” had been taken from the monographs of Maspero, Mattier and Breasted. But the Russians interpreted those symbols of our ancient culture in their own way. Moreover they attach great importance to the process of symbols interpretation and call it with the strange term unable to translate on other languages.

Salem took a sheet of paper and showed the two words written in English – “tihaya sapa”. Then he continued his story.

When I asked them to explain the meaning of this term, they at first told that these words came from the field engineering: so in the past was called an undermining of enemies positions where explosives were set and after suddenly detonated. But seeing the perplexity at my face they began to explain how the matrix methods of ruling work. They think that hierophants were proficient in them more than any other. That time I understood next to nothing from their story because they used some new terminology. But after the film “Matrix” something became clear, for me at least. In their story it was told of the Universe as of the process of the triunity[64] of information, measure and matter. So they called the primary philosophical categories, which the hierophants’ worldview was founded on. I’ve already told you, Holmes, that I had studied the modern philosophy at Cambridge. But that, what I’ve heard from the Russians, was exceeding the borders of all studied in England under the direction of your professors. I failed to rely on knowledge got during my independent lessons.

With all this the Russians rather convincingly with the examples taken from a life showed me, that the European public philosophy makes everybody, who deals with it at the first time, to choose: either materialism or idealism – there isn’t another choice. As it happens there is. And this third alternative is defined by the objective measure of being. Moreover they showed that using the symbiosis of the Russian Tradition and the Koran knowledge one can understand the objectivity of the categories of information and measure. “There is no thing without its image” – does the Russian proverb say. “Allah created all things and measured it” – is said in Koran. You, Holmes, would probably ask me what it was for – maintaining the oscillation of the public mind from materialism to idealism and back. I discussed this question with the Russians and they answered me, that there always were two systems of knowledge about the world and hence two educational system. The first was for wide masses; the second was for the small circle, which had chosen the mission to rule.

Historically it’s traced in all cultures types, the educational systems of which we are familiar to. Already in Ancient Egypt the education for officials and for lesser clerical casts differed greatly from what the small chosen circle that formed the highest znakharstvo and pharaohs’ court were let to. In Ancient Mesopotamia one can see the same difference. In Ancient Judea the knowledge for people (Torah, Talmud and chronicles) also differed greatly from Levites’ knowledge. Finally the Christian church during its domination over the minds of Middle-Aged Europe also had one true for people and regular clergy and another one for the initiated.