When describing the interrelations of subjects with the field reality in words, some extrasenses speak about various “connections” to the person, “tentacles and feelers”, which connect and enter the body through the glowing “eggshell” — the boundary of one’s aura. The “connectors” have a beginning and end, and, accordingly, all those “connected” in their integrity create a system, a functionally specific element of which is each one of them.

Such a system in esoteric sciences, occultism, in the “extrasense” slang is called “egregore”. Since the film does not show, where the ends of the material connecting “feelers-hoses” go, then this system is shown not as a field structure, but as the machine “Matrix” itself, belonging to the material world. As it is said in the film, all of humanity is a source of energy for the Matrix — i.e. people are batteries. With respect to egregores, the position of most is analogous: to feed them with their own energy, needed for the realization of aims of the owners and managers of egregores. Through “connections” each subject gives the egregores his energy, and through the very same “connections” the egregore and its managers influence all those “connected”, consequent of which most of those “connected” are more or less not in control of themselves.

That is, the entire sequence of horrifying images in the film — is not fantasy and is not schizophrenic delusions, but a visualization on the screen of a rather real egregore, which is now controlling the Western regional civilization.

The exit of any individual from under the power of an egregore he despises, as it is correctly shown in the “Matrix”, begins from identifying the “connections” and subsequently removing them. The process of disconnection from an egregore may happen in two stages: at the first stage a third party tears the energetic-informational links between the subject and egregore; at the second stage, when the subject is artificially isolated from the egregore, he is provided information, the character of which excludes the possibility of return to the former egregore. At the same time, an informational commonality with the one providing the information is inevitably established. And if that information is common to a group of people, then automatically the connection to their egregore occurs. A subject, living in society of those like him, cannot avoid connecting to an egregore. But the relation of a subject with egregores, generated by culture, may be different:

● a person may be a captive of an egregore, in the sense that the person’s behaviour is not determined by his own will, but is a continuation of the egregore algorithmics (this applies to egregorial leaders — those, whose will dominates the egregore, but only within the limits of existing egregorial algorithms and informational provisioning, outside the limits of which they cannot go);

● a person may be a manager of an egregore (a manager of an egregore is not tied by its egregorial algorithmics and information provisioning), in relation to which its other members may be captives;

● an egregore may be common to a group of people, none of whom is its captive, and exactly this is the normal state of relations of one’s personal psyche and an egregore.

In relation to the plot of the film, if all “connections” to an enslaving “Matrix” are removed, then the heroes of the film, free from the bad “Matrix”, should be in miraculous harmony without any internal problems and conflicts in their collective. At this point of the film, however, the plot appears to fail.

Due to the fact that the imagination of script writers, producers, and actors lies within the prison of the matrix of the Biblical civilization, and the fact that the authors of the film during its creation turned out to be morally incapable of exiting its walls, they do not have the slightest idea about the nature of any alternative matrix-predetermination and the way of life under its conceptual power. For this reason, the heroes of the film, having been physically freed of the evil “Matrix”, in the supposed “real world” behave exactly like characters living under the power of the “Matrix”. It is useful to correlate with Russian literature, the authors of which worked on helping humanity to not formally, but actually free itself from the power of the biblical matrix: this is why characters in A.S. Pushkin’s “Ruslan and Ludmila”, the novel of N.G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?”, many works of I.A. Efremov, first and foremost — “Bull’s hour” and “Andromeda Nebula”, behave completely different than do most characters in the works of crowd-“elitist” biblical culture. This is an indication that the imagination of many Russian artists was free from the oppression of the Bible in all times.

The script writers and their “extrasense” and occult consultants seem to have forgotten about the main system of “connections”, which essentially turns humanity, carrying the technical civilization, into a parasitic virus on Mother-Earth. This system of “connections” has been well known from ancient times, and even in the times of the stone age this connection was depicted rather artlessly, very clearly and understandably.

The Matrix and “The Matrix” — two opposites. (On the recipe of obtaining “freedom” in the movie “The Matrix”) img_0.jpeg

What could this mean...?

This is not a primitive analogue of contemporary obscene naturalistic drawings that can be seen on the walls of toilets and elevators. The drawing is an allegory (in modified images of the material world) to the reality, taking place in one of the nonmaterial worlds. Let’s consider it for a moment.

The psyche of any individual is a multicomponent informational system. In particular, the psyche is an informational-metric system, since the psyche is first and foremost algorithmics. Algorithmics is a succession of steps of information processing, which is impossible without different matrices intrinsic to the algorithmics — matrices, which represent various types of “traces” (or “scans”) from the objective all-enclosing measure-matrix — the Highest Predetermination of Life.

The psyche generates the person’s behavior on the basis of that, which in computer terms is named “dataware” (informational provisioning). The dataware of human behavior has several components, and includes:

● instincts of the biological species “Homo Sapiens”;

● habits (skills) acquired from social culture in a ready-to-use state and executed for the most part (like instinctive programs) automatically in perturbing situations;

● products of the individual’s own intellectual efforts;

● intuition, which includes several components:

● results autonomously (from the surrounding environment) created by the work of unconscious levels of the individual’s psyche;

● spiritual (biofield) influence on the psyche by the collective psyche, which the individual partakes in within the spiritual world;

● external delusions and “possession” (i.e. “being possessed”), as a result of field-level influence on the individual of other subjects, both materialised and non-materialized spirits;

● direct guidance from Above.

Behaviour dataware sourced from certain components named above, does not always coincide conflict-free with information provisioning sourced from the other named components. Depending on the individual’s preference, he allows this or that algorithm to realize in his behaviour (both in the material and spiritual worlds), which determines the psyche type of the individual (regardless of whether or not the individual realizes what a psyche type is). As a result of ambiguity in deciding on a preference when a conflict between different components of dataware occurs, in society more or less clearly manifests a tendency to polarization:

● on one pole are those, who (for the most part unconsciously) strives to subordinate everything to the satisfaction of their instinctive needs;