“Nothing,” Kohl said simply, sighing angrily. “We can do nothing. And it was my fault.”

“Your fault, sir?”

“Ach, the subtleties of our job, Janssen… I wished to give nothing away about our purpose and so I said we wished to see this man about a matter of ‘state security,’ which we say far too readily nowadays. My words suggested that the crime wasn’t the murder of an innocent victim but perhaps an offense against the government – which, of course, was at war with their country less than twenty years ago. Many of those athletes undoubtedly lost relatives, even fathers, to the Kaiser’s army, and might feel a patriotic interest in protecting such a man. And now it is too late to retract what I so carelessly said.”

When they reached the street in front of the village, Janssen turned toward where they had parked the DKW. But Kohl asked, “Where are you going?”

“Aren’t we returning to Berlin?”

“Not yet. We’ve been denied our passenger manifest. But destruction of evidence implies a reason to destroy it, and that reason might logically be found near the point of its loss. So we’ll make some inquiries. We must continue our trail the hard way, by using our poor feet… Ach, that food smells good, doesn’t it? They’re cooking well for the athletes. I remember when I used to swim daily. Years ago. Why, then I could eat whatever I wanted and never gain a gram. Those days are long behind me, I’m afraid. To the right here, Janssen, to the right.”

Reinhard Ernst dropped his phone into its cradle and closed his eyes. He leaned back in the heavy chair in his Chancellory office. For the first time in several days he felt content – no, he felt joyous. A sense of victory swept through him, as keen as when he and his sixty-seven surviving men successfully defended the northwestern redoubt against three hundred Allied troops near Verdun. That had earned him the Iron Cross, first-class – and an admiring look from Wilhelm II (only the Kaiser’s withered arm had prevented him from pinning the decoration on Ernst’s chest himself) – but this success today, which would be greeted with no public accolades, of course, was far sweeter.

One of the greatest problems he’d faced in rebuilding the German navy was the section in the Versailles treaty that forbade Germany to have submarines and limited the number of warships to six battleships, six light cruisers, twelve destroyers and twelve torpedo boats.

Absurd, of course, even for basic defense.

But last year Ernst had engineered a coup. He and brash Ambassador-at-Large Joachim von Ribbentrop had negotiated the Anglo-German Naval Treaty, which allowed submarine construction and lifted the limitation on Germany’s surface navy to 35 percent of the size of England’s. But the most important part of the pact had never been tested until now. It had been Ernst’s brainstorm to have Ribbentrop negotiate the percentage not in terms of number of ships, as had been the measure at Versailles, but in tonnage.

Germany now had the legal right to build even more ships than Britain had, as long as the total tonnage never exceeded the magic 35 percent. Moreover, it had been the goal all along of Ernst and Erich Raeder, commander in chief of the navy, to create lighter, more mobile and deadlier fighting vessels, rather than behemoth battleships that made up the bulk of the British war fleet – ships that were vulnerable to attack by aircraft and submarines.

The only question had been: Would England claim a foul when they reviewed the shipyard construction reports and realized that the German navy would be far bigger than expected?

The caller on the other end of the line, though, a German diplomatic aide in London, had just reported that the British government had reviewed the figures and approved them without a second thought.

What a success this was!

He drafted a note to the Leader to give him the good news and had a runner deliver it in person.

Just as the clock on the wall was striking four, a bald, middle-aged man wearing a brown tweed jacket and ribbed slacks stepped into Ernst’s office. “Colonel, I just-”

Ernst shook his head and touched his lips, silencing Doctor-professor Ludwig Keitel. The colonel spun around and glanced out the window. “What a delightful afternoon it is.”

Keitel frowned; it was one of the hottest days of the year, close to thirty-four degrees, and the wind was filled with grit. But he remained silent, an eyebrow raised.

Ernst pointed toward the door. Keitel nodded and together they stepped into the hallway outside and then left the Chancellory. Turning north on Wilhelm Street they continued to Under the Lindens and turned west, chatting only of the weather, the Olympics, a new American movie that was supposed to open soon. Like the Leader, both men admired the American actress Greta Garbo. Her film Anna Karenina had just been approved for release in Germany, despite its Russian setting and questionable morality. Discussing her recent films, they entered the Tiergarten just past the Brandenburg Gate.

Finally, looking around for tails or surveillance, Keitel spoke. “What is this about, Reinhard?”

“There is madness among us, Doctor.” Ernst sighed.

“No, are you making a joke?” asked the professor sardonically.

“Yesterday the Leader asked me for a report on the Waltham Study.”

Keitel took a moment to digest this information. “The Leader? Himself?”

“I was hoping he would forget it. He has been wholly preoccupied with the Olympics. But apparently not.” He showed Keitel Hitler’s note and then related the story of how the Leader had learned of the study. “Thanks to the man of many titles and more kilos.”

“Fat Hermann,” Keitel said loudly, sighing angrily.

“Sssh,” Ernst said. “Speak through flowers.” A common expression nowadays, meaning: Say only good things when mentioning Party officials by name in public.

Keitel shrugged. In a softer voice he continued, “Why should he care about us?”

Ernst had neither the time nor the energy to discuss the machinations of the National Socialist government to a man whose life was essentially academic.

“Well, my friend,” Keitel said, “what are we going to do?”

“I’ve decided that we go on the offensive. We hit back hard. We’ll give him a report – by Monday. A detailed report.”

“Two days?” Keitel scoffed. “We have only raw data and even that’s very limited. Can’t you tell him that in a few months we’ll have better analysis? We could-”

“No, Doctor,” Ernst said, laughing. If one could not speak through flowers, a whisper would do. “One does not tell the Leader to wait a few months. Or a few days or minutes. No, it’s best for us to do this now. A lightning strike. That’s what we must do. Göring will continue his intriguing and may meddle enough so that the Leader digs deeper, doesn’t like what be sees and stops the study altogether. The file he stole was some of Freud’s writings. That’s what he mentioned in the meeting yesterday. I think the phrase was ‘Jew mind-doctor.’ You should have seen the Leader’s face. I thought I was on my way to Oranienburg.”

“Freud was brilliant,” Keitel whispered. “The ideas are important.”

“We can use his ideas. And those of the other psychologists. But-”

“Freud is a psycho analyst.”

Ach, academics, Ernst thought. Worse than politicians. “But we won’t attribute them in our study.”

“That’s intellectually dishonest,” Keitel said sullenly. “Moral integrity is important.”

“Under these circumstances, no, it’s not” was Ernst’s firm response. “We’re not going to publish the work in some university journal. That’s not what this is about.”

“Fine, fine,” Keitel said impatiently. “That still doesn’t address my concern. Not enough data.”

“I know. I’ve decided we must find more volunteers. A dozen. It will be the biggest group yet – to impress the Leader and make him ignore Göring.”