“Comedian!” thought Harriet, as Miss Barton, finding she could make nothing of him, passed him on to Miss Hillyard.

“Ah!” said Wimsey instantly, smiling into the History Tutor’s sulky eyes, “this is delightful. Your paper in the Historical Review on the diplomatic aspects of the Divorce…”

(Heavens! thought Harriet, I hope he knows his stuff.)

“… really masterly. Indeed, I felt that, if anything, you had slightly underestimated the pressure brought to bear upon Clement by…”

“… consulted the unedited dispatches in the possession of…”

“… you might have carried the argument a trifle further. You very rightly point out that the Emperor…”

(Yes; he had read the article all right.)

“… disfigured by prejudice, but a considerable authority on the Canon Law…”

“… needing to be thoroughly overhauled and re-edited. Innumerable mistranscriptions and at least one unscrupulous omission…”

“…If at any time you require access, I could probably put you into touch… official channels… personal introduction… raise no difficulties…”

“Miss Hillyard,” said the Dean to Harriet, “looks as though she had been given a birthday present.”

“I think he’s offering her access to some out-of-the-way source of information.” (After all, she thought, he is Somebody, though one never seems able to remember it.)

“… not so much political as economic.”

“Ah!” said Miss Hillyard, “when it comes to a question of national finance Miss de Vine is the real authority.”

She effected the introduction herself, and the discussion continued. “Well,” said the Dean, “he has made a complete conquest of Miss Hillyard.”

“And Miss de Vine is making a complete conquest of him.”

“It’s mutual, I fancy. At any rate, her back hair’s coming down, which is a sure sign of pleasure and excitement.”

“Yes,” said Harriet. Wimsey was arguing with intelligence about the appropriation of monastic funds, but she had little doubt that the back of his mind was full of hairpins.

“Here comes the Warden. We shall have to separate them forcibly. He’s got to face Dr. Baring and take her in to dinner… All’s well. She has collared him. That firm assertion of the Royal Prerogative!… Do you want to sit next him and hold his hand?”

“I don’t think he needs any assistance from me. You’re the person for him. Not a suspect, but full of lively information.”

“All right; I’ll go and prattle to him. You’d better sit opposite to us and kick me if I say anything indiscreet.”

By this arrangement, Harriet found herself placed a little uncomfortably between Miss Hillyard (in whom she always felt an antagonism to herself) and Miss Barton (who was obviously still worried about Wimsey’s detective hobbies), and face to face with the two people whose glances were most likely to disturb her gravity. On the other side of the Dean sat Miss Pyke; on the other side of Miss Hillyard was Miss de Vine, well under Wimsey’s eye. Miss Lydgate, that secure fortress, was situated at the far end of the table, offering no kind of refuge.

Neither Miss Hillyard nor Miss Barton had much to say to Harriet, who was thus able to follow, without too much difficulty, the Warden’s straightforward determination to size up Wimsey and Wimsey’s diplomatically veiled but equally obstinate determination to size up the Warden; a contest carried on with unwavering courtesy on either side.

Dr. Baring began by inquiring whether Lord Peter had been conducted over the College and what he thought of it, adding, with due modesty, that architecturally, of course, it could scarcely hope to compete with the more ancient foundations.

“Considering,” said his lordship plaintively, “that the architecture of my own ancient foundation is mathematically compounded of ambition, distraction, uglification and derision, that remark sounds like sarcasm.”

The Warden, almost seduced into believing herself guilty of a breach of manners, earnestly assured him that she had intended no personal allusion. “An occasional reminder is good for us,” said he. “We are mortified in nineteenth-century Gothic, lest in our overweening Balliolity we forget God. We pulled down the good to make way for the bad; you, on the contrary, have made the world out of nothing-a more divine procedure.”

The Warden, maneuvering uneasily on this slippery ground between jest and earnest, found foothold:

“It is quite true that we have had to make what we can out of very little-and that, you know, is typical of our whole position here.”

“Yes; you are practically without endowments?”

The question was so offered as to include the Dean, who said cheerfully: “Quite right. All done by cheeseparing.”

“That being so,” he said, seriously, “even to admire seems to be a kind of impertinence. This is a very fine hall-who is the architect?” the Warden supplied him with a little local history, breaking off to say: “But probably you are not specially interested in all this question of women’s education.”

“Is it still a question? It ought not to be. I hope you are not going to ask me whether I approve of women’s doing this and that.”

“Why not?”

“You should not imply that I have any right either to approve or disapprove.”

“I assure you,” said the Warden, “that even in Oxford we still encounter a certain number of people who maintain their right to disapprove.”

“And I had hoped I was returning to civilization.”

The removal of fish-plates caused a slight diversion, and the Warden took the opportunity to turn her inquiries upon the situation in Europe. Here the guest was on his own ground. Harriet caught the Dean’s eye and smiled. But the more formidable challenge was coming. International politics led to history, and history-in Dr. Baring’s mind-to philosophy. The ominous name of Plato suddenly emerged from a tangle of words, and Dr. Baring moved out a philosophical speculation, like a pawn, and planted it temptingly en prise.

Many persons had plunged to irretrievable disaster over the Warden’s philosophic pawn. There were two ways of taking it: both disastrous. One was to pretend to knowledge; the other, to profess an insincere eagerness for instruction. His lordship smiled gently and refused the gambit:

“That is out of my stars. I have not the philosophic mind.”

“And how would you define the philosophic mind, Lord Peter?”

“I wouldn’t, definitions are dangerous. But I know that philosophy is a closed book to me, as music is to the tone-deaf.”

The Warden looked at him quickly; he presented her with an innocent profile, drooping and contemplative over his plate, like a heron brooding by a pond.

“A very apt illustration,” said the Warden; “as it happens, I am tone-deaf myself.”

“Are you? I thought you might be,” he said, equably.

“That is very interesting. How can you tell?”

“There is something in the quality of the voice.” He offered candid grey eyes for examination. “But it’s not a very safe conclusion to draw, and, as you may have noticed, I didn’t draw it. That is the art of the charlatan-to induce a confession and present it as the result of deduction.”

“I see,” said Dr. Baring. “You expose your technique very frankly.”

“You would have seen through it in any case, so it is better to expose one’s self and acquire an unmerited reputation for candour. The great advantage about telling the truth is that nobody ever believes it-that is at the bottom of the λέγειν ώζ δεϊt.”

“So there is one philosopher whose books are not closed to you? Next time, I will start by way of Aristotle.”

She turned to her left-hand neighbor and released him.

“I am sorry,” said the Dean, “we have no strong drink to offer you.” His face was eloquent of mingled apprehension and mischief.

“The toad beneath the harrow knows where every separate tooth-point goes. Do you always prove your guests with hard questions?”